(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3703) Atomic stuff
Aleksandar Donev
donev1 at llnl.gov
Wed Dec 3 01:27:34 EST 2008
Hi Van,
> 1. Provide an attribute for a variable that says accesses to it are
> atomic.
While this may be preferable to the use of intrinsics, it is also much
more complex to get right, especially in terms of matching of the
attribute across association (can you point a nonatomic pointer to an
atomic, how about arrays, etc.).
The other two ideas, while possibly technically useful, have nothing to
do with ATOMIC. Until Fortran proper has accessors/updaters their use
for atomic operations is out of the question.
I prefer alternative mechanisms to specify atomic operations (notably an
ATOMIC block), but, that was not the goal. The goal was to provide some
simple mechanism for spin loops and the like without the problems of
VOLATILE. It is a compromise, and nobody's first preference. Nothing
wrong with that, IMO, especially since it is just two intrinsics and not
something that fundamentally messes up the language for eternity.
Best,
Aleks
--
Aleksandar Donev, Ph.D.
Lawrence Postdoctoral Fellow @ LLNL
High Performance Computational Materials Science and Chemistry
E-mail: donev1 at llnl.gov
Phone: (925) 424-6816 Fax: (925) 423-0785
Address: P.O.Box 808, L-367, Livermore, CA 94551-9900
Web: http://cherrypit.princeton.edu/donev
More information about the J3
mailing list