(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3994) Paper 09-238

[Malcolm Cohen]

Hi Bill,

Bill Long wrote:
> That would be effectively the same as going back to the old days when
> the reply-to field was not overwritten, and you always used "reply all"
> instead.  That seems like the simplest solution.
>
>   
I agree that that would be preferable to the current situation.

Cheers,
-- 
.....................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.