(j3.2006) C1247 and C1248

[Van Snyder]

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 05:08 -0700, Bill Long wrote:
> 
> Van Snyder wrote:
> > It seems that C1248 duplicates C1247, but less precisely.
> 
> 
> C1248 and C1262 seem redundant as well.

C1262 constrains a different statement from C1247/C1248, so I don't
think it's redundant.

> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> 
> > 
> > Does it do something new?
> > 
> > It wasn't in the TR.  It appeared between 09-007 and 09-007r1, but I 
> > can't find the paper that introduced it.
> > 
> > Van
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > J3 mailing list
> > J3 at j3-fortran.org
> > http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>