(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4161) Question about our design for associate names

[Aleksandar Donev]

On Friday 05 February 2010, Jim Xia wrote:
> there is no evidence at this point that DO CONCURRENT construct is
> anything better than FORALL.
God knows what you mean by "evidence". The two constructs are different 
things. And there are several compilers that support IVDEP or some such 
directive and I am sure they did it for a reason (is this evidence?). DO 
CONCURRENT is new but is simply a standardization of that.
Best,
Aleks